As the world navigates the complex aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic, one cannot overlook the significant shifts in governance and individual freedoms, particularly in China. The events surrounding Hong Kong, combined with the Chinese government’s response to the pandemic, reveal a troubling trend toward increased control over its citizens. The implications of these developments are profound, not only for the people of China but also for global relationships, especially for the West in terms of trade and diplomacy.
The Situation in Hong Kong
Since the handover of Hong Kong from British rule in 1997, there has been a gradual erosion of the autonomy and freedoms that were promised under the "one country, two systems" principle. The situation escalated dramatically in 2019 with widespread pro-democracy protests, which saw millions of Hong Kong residents taking to the streets against perceived encroachments on their freedoms by the Chinese government.
In response to these protests, Beijing implemented the National Security Law in June 2020, which has since been used to suppress dissent and stifle political freedoms in the region. Many pro-democracy activists have been arrested, media outlets shut down, and educational curricula altered to promote a narrative more aligned with the Communist Party’s ideology.
COVID-19: A Tool for Control?
The COVID-19 pandemic presented a unique opportunity for the Chinese government to further tighten its grip on not only Hong Kong but also other major cities across the country. In Hubei Province, where the pandemic originated, extreme measures were enacted to contain the virus. Reports of authorities welding doors shut on apartment buildings and forcibly quarantining individuals who tested positive created an environment of fear and compliance. These drastic actions effectively suppressed public dissent and limited citizens’ ability to organize protests against government policies.
The pandemic restrictions, coupled with the imposition of the National Security Law, allowed the Chinese government to implement policies that might have faced considerable resistance under normal circumstances. The lockdowns, surveillance measures, and control over information created a scenario where dissent was not just discouraged but nearly impossible. Critics argue that these actions were not merely reactions to a public health crisis but strategic moves to solidify governmental control during a time when the population was more vulnerable and less able to protest.
Parallels in the West: Overreach During the Pandemic
While China’s measures were particularly draconian, it is important to recognize that similar patterns of government overreach were seen in Western countries during the pandemic. Although not as extreme, governments around the world, including many in Europe and North America, enacted sweeping emergency measures that infringed upon individual freedoms.
For example:
- Mandatory lockdowns confined citizens to their homes for extended periods.
- Curfews were enforced in some countries, limiting movement even for essential activities.
- Health passports and mandatory vaccinations were imposed, restricting individuals’ access to public spaces, jobs, and travel based on their medical status.
- Freedom of assembly was curtailed, preventing protests or large gatherings that could voice opposition to government actions.
While these measures were justified as necessary for public health, many critics argue that they overstepped the bounds of constitutional rights and freedoms. The fact that some of these laws and restrictions remain in place today—well after the immediate threat of COVID-19 has receded—raises concerns about how easily governments can extend their powers in times of crisis, even in democracies.
The Concern for Citizens Worldwide
These developments should be a concern for all citizens of the world. The pandemic has shown that, when given the opportunity, governments—whether authoritarian or democratic—can quickly move to expand their control. In many cases, these expansions of power are not easily reversed, even when the crisis that justified them has passed.
This erosion of rights, if unchecked, threatens the principles of self-governance and individual liberty that are foundational to democratic societies. Governments derive their power from the people, not from an elite class that claims superior knowledge or moral authority. When governments impose rules and restrictions without the clear consent of the governed, it sets a dangerous precedent for future overreach, creating a class of bureaucrats and political leaders who act as though they know better than the citizens they serve.
The Role of Trade in Promoting Freedom
While the challenges are significant, trade can also be a tool for promoting change in countries like China. The following approaches could be considered:
-
Conditional Trade Agreements: Western nations could explore establishing trade agreements that include human rights provisions. By tying economic benefits to improvements in civil liberties, there may be a greater incentive for the Chinese government to allow more freedoms for its citizens.
-
Support for Human Rights Organizations: Businesses and governments can provide funding and support to organizations advocating for human rights in China. By amplifying the voices of those fighting for freedom, the global community can help foster change from the grassroots level.
-
Public Awareness Campaigns: Companies operating in China can leverage their platforms to raise awareness about human rights abuses. Consumer pressure and public accountability can lead to greater scrutiny of the Chinese government’s actions and influence change over time.
-
Investment in Alternatives: Diversifying supply chains away from China and investing in countries with stronger human rights records can reduce reliance on an authoritarian regime and encourage better practices globally.
A Call for Nations to Uphold the Rights of Man
In light of the events in China, the pandemic, and the sweeping restrictions imposed by governments around the world, all nations, particularly Western democracies, must uphold the God-given rights of man. These rights, enshrined in the constitutions and founding documents of many nations, should not be overridden by government powers that have not been granted by their citizens.
It is imperative that nations reverse the draconian measures enacted during the pandemic that continue to infringe upon human rights. Governments must be reminded that their authority comes from the people and not from an elite ruling class that claims superior knowledge or authority to act beyond constitutional limits.
Those seeking election should commit to restoring the freedoms that were restricted during the pandemic. The right to assemble, the right to privacy, the right to work and move freely—these fundamental freedoms must be fully restored. Citizens must demand accountability from those in power to ensure that governments, particularly in democracies, respect the boundaries placed on them by their constitutions and the people they serve.
Conclusion: A Global Concern for Human Rights
The developments in Hong Kong and China, and the broader actions taken by governments worldwide during the pandemic, highlight a dangerous trend toward government overreach. Whether in an authoritarian regime like China or in democratic nations, the erosion of freedoms poses a threat to the principles of liberty and self-governance.
By leveraging trade and advocating for the reversal of restrictive measures, the global community can work toward a world where human rights are respected, and governments remain accountable to their people. This is not only a concern for China but for every citizen of the world, as the post-pandemic reality continues to shape the future of governance and freedom.
